Bacteria, carotenoids and eye health

This piece of work was submitted by Weny Tjong, as a 3rd-year student in the School of Applied Sciences at RMIT University in 2008. It was part of a wider body of work looking at the potential to have bacterial sources of zeaxanthin incorporated into novel functional food products, a different perspective on food microbiology. This blog article covers an introduction to carotenoids, their importance in eye health and then some microbial sources of zeaxanthin. The idea is that these species could form the basis of microbiology processes for industrial production of zeaxanthin for incorporation into food. What are carotenoids? Carotenoids are liposoluble tetraterpenes, they are widely distributed pigments occurring in flowering plants, algae, fungi and bacteria, and also in animals as diverse as birds and crustaceans (Schieber & Carle, 2005). They can only be synthesised by plants and bacteria, and thus their presence in animals is due to ingestion via food and subsequent accumulation in certain tissues. In plants, these carotenoids are localized in subcellular organelles (plastids), such as chloroplasts and chromoplasts. There are two main classes of naturally occurring carotenoids: carotenes and xanthophylls (Saljita, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). Carotenes are hydrocarbons that are either linear or cyclised at one or both ends of the molecule, whereas xanthophylls are the oxygenated derivatives of carotenes. Examples of carotenes include β-carotene and α-carotene, and xanthophylls include violaxanthin, antheraxanthin, zeaxanthin, neoxanthin and lutein.  Carotenoids have a conjugated double bond system that constitutes the light absorbing chromophore which gives them their bright colour, and presence in the visible absorption spectrum which aids their identification and quantification (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). All-trans isomers strongly absorb visible light in region between 400 and 500 nm, while cis-isomers absorb light in the near UV region (~ 320 nm). Carotenoids in eye health The carotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin may be beneficial to macular health as they are the only carotenoids found in the eye (Jones, 2007). This is also supported by Yeum et al., 1996 and Updike & Schwartz, 2003. Their data indicate that the main carotenoids present in both human macula and lenses are lutein and zeaxanthin. Lutein and zeaxanthin are therefore the primary components of the human macula pigment. Lutein and zeaxanthin concentration is found to be approximately 500 times higher than the concentration in other tissues (Mares-Perlman et al., 2002). Zeaxanthin is more prominent in the inner macula whereas lutein is more dominant away from the fovea. This distribution of lutein and zeaxanthin in the retina suggests the possible role of lutein in protecting the rods that are concentrated in the peripheral retina and zeaxanthin in protecting the cones that are concentrated in the central retina. Bone et al. 1998 has proposed that the role of these macular pigments may be two-fold: to improve visual acuity and to protect the retinal tissues against photo-degradation. Microbial sources of zexanthin Microbial production of zeaxanthin has gained some interest in the nutraceutical industry. As they are amongst the few microbes that synthesize zeaxanthin as their predominant carotenoid, the choice of the microbial source is critical. The determination of which microorganism produces higher yield of zeaxanthin is carried out by performing HPLC analysis with ultraviolet/visible or photodiode array detection on the extracted carotenoids from the microorganisms (Gierhart, 1995).  Sphingobacterium multivorum Zeaxanthin is essentially the only carotenoid produced by Sphingobacterium multivorum. The pigment formed by this species consists of 95% to 99% zeaxanthin, with the zeaxanthin produced being identical to that of Zea mays (Gierhart, 1995). Since β-carotene and β-cryptoxanthin are the precursors in biosynthesis of zeaxanthin, their presence (~ 5% to 10%) is observed during the initial growth phases of Sphingobacterium multivorum The hydroxylation of these precursors subsequently leads to zeaxanthin. Sphingobacterium multivorum cultures are able to produce up to 190 mg zeaxanthin per litre, with specific cell concentration of 16 mg per gram dried cellular mass (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). These cultures are grown in media containing glucose or sucrose, sulphur-containing amino acids such as methionie, cysteine or cystine, pyridoxine, and bivalent metal ions such as Fe2+ ,Co2+ ,Mo2+ or Mn2+. Erwinia herbicola Erwinia herbicola is a non photosynthetic bacterium which is yellow in colour due to accumulation of mono- and di- glucosides of zeaxanthin carotenoids (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008).  Neospongioccoccum Neospongioccoccum is one of FDA approved generally regarded as safe (GRAS) strains which has been added into poultry feed to enhance their yellow pigmentation (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). In addition, it is known that the green alga Neospongiococcum excentricum produces up to 0.65% xanthophylls on the dry basis.  Spirulina Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008 has reviewed that this blue-green alga has been fed to cultured prawns to enhance their carapace colour. The zeaxanthin produced by Spirulina, is converted into astaxanthin responsible for the colour enhancement. In the case of broiled chicken, accumulation of zeaxanthin within the flesh is provided by Spirulina, which increases the yellowness and redness in it. There are many more other microbial sources of zeaxanthin. Among these are Dunaliella salina, Synechocystis sp, Microcystis aeruginosa, and Phaffia rhodozyma. The details of these are available in Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008.  References Bone, R. A., Landrum, J. T., Fernandez, L. Tarsis, S. L. (1988). Analysis of the macular pigment by HPLC retinal distribution and age study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 29(6), 843-849.  Gierhart, D. L. & Applied Food Biotechnology Inc. (1995). Zeaxanthin-containing compositions produced by Flavobacterium multivorum. U.S. patent 5,427,783. date of issue June 27 1995. Jones, A. A. (2007). Age related macular degeneration: should your patients be taking additional supplements. Australian Family Physician, 36(12), 1026-1028. Mares-Perlman, J. A., Millen, A. E., Ficek, T. L & Hankinson, S. E. (2002). The body evidence to support a protective role for lutein and zeaxanthin in delaying chronic disease. The Journal of Nutrition, 132, 518S-524S. Sajilata, M. G., Singhal, R.S. & Kamat, M. Y. (2008). The carotenoid pigment zeaxanthin. Food Science and Food Safety, 7, 29-49. Schieber, A. & Carle, R. (2005). Occurrence of carotenoid cis-isomers in food: technological, analytical, and nutritional

Zeaxanthin production by Sphingobacterium multivorum

This blog article is a small extract from an Honours research proposal (that didn’t proceed), written in 2008 by one of my students at RMIT University, Weny Tjong. I have provided some current updates in particular areas. Even though this article would be considered within the realm of industrial microbiology and biotechnology, the connection to food microbiology and food science in general is because this purified zeaxanthin was to be used to fortify food products. One potential Sphingobacterium sp. to be considered as a source of zeaxanthin is Sphingobacterium multivorum (Figure 1) as it is a non fastidious and (generally) non-pathogenic bacterium that rapidly accumulates zeaxanthin through their fermentation (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). Although generally pathogenic, there are a handful of reports of disease caused by the species (for example: Abro et al., 2016 and Mendes et al., 2016). Bacteria are seen to have great potential for industrial production of carotenoids (Ram et al., 2020). The suggestion of its rapid zeaxanthin accumulation is very much supported by Alcantara and Sanchez (1999), and Garnett et al. (1998). The ATCC number of this bacterial strain is 55238. It is reported that under proper fermentation conditions, zeaxanthin can be synthesized by this bacterium with virtually no significant amount of other carotenoids (Gierhart, 1994). Hence, the difficulty in purifying zeaxanthin from its closely related carotenoids can be eliminated with the use of Sphingobacterium multivorum and its descendants. Sphingobacterium multivorum characteristics With a few exceptions, Sphingobacterium sp. can be categorized into two categories: strongly proteolytic – digest gelatine, casein and coagulated serum- and non proteolytic (Gierhart, 1994). S. meningosepticum (biovar IIa) and S. indologenes (viovar IIb) are always proteolytic; other Flavobacteria are not. Sphingobacterium multivivorum is non proteolytic.  S. multivorum grows in smooth, non pigmented colonies of size less than 1 mm on a 1 day sheep blood agar plate (Gierhart, 1994) (Figure 2). They are oxidase-positive, catalase-positive, Gram negative rods, non-motile, strongly sucrose-positive, always mannitol-negative and ethanol-negative, and urea-positive. The plate shows no zones of inhibition surrounding penicillin, vancomycin, and polymyxin disks. S. multivorum  zeaxanthin production The stereoisomeric isomers of zeaxanthin appear to be small, subtle and almost insignificant. Nonetheless, when it comes to retinal tissue, only the 3R-3’R zeaxanthin stereoisomer (Figure 3) is properly taken up and used by human retinal cells (Garnett et al., 1998).  Traces quantities of the meso-zeaxanthin isomers have been reportedly to be found in retinal tissues (Garnett et al., 1998). However, it is argued that these trace quantities are probably the result of molecular conversion of the lutein precursors under some conditions.  S. multivorum only produces desired R-R isomers and do not synthesize other undesired S–S or S-R isomers of zeaxanthin and significant quantities of other carotenoids such as β-carotene or lutein, which might compete against zeaxanthin for the alimentary uptake after oral ingestion (Garnett et al. 1998). The concentration of the zeaxanthin obtained after the cell fermentation can be concentrated to approximately 5 to 20% by simple and inexpensive steps such as solvent extraction, and/or purified to much higher levels by other methods if desired.  Factors That Affect Zeaxanthin Production in Sphingobacterium sp. Nitrogen and carbon sources Studies were done by Alcantara and Sanchez in 1999 whereby the growth of Sphingobacterium sp. utilizing different carbon and nitrogen sources were observed. The result of this observation is shown in Figure 6. Sucrose and both asparagine and glutamine were found to be the best stimulator for growth and pigment formation. The carotenoid production and glucose consumption increased in respect to asparagine concentration that depletes as it is used by Sphingobacterium sp. as their primary source of nitrogen for growth and zeaxanthin production. The presence of asparagine together with high glucose concentrations in fact decreases pigment production although the biomass formation is unaffected (Alcantara and Sanchez, 1999). However, without glucose, asparagine could not support growth of the cells and subsequent zeaxanthin production.  (Alcantara & Sanchez, 1999) CD: Chemically defined OD: Optical density ^ Effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on growth and zeaxanthin production The Presence of Corn Steep Liquor Corn steep liquor is known to be beneficial on for the growth and pigment synthesis of Sphingobacterium sp. (Gierhart, 1994). It is thought that this corn steep liquor contains good amounts of amino acids and minerals necessary for the growth of these microorganisms. Without any special measurement taken, the fermentation of Sphingobacterium sp. in glucose and corn steep liquor containing medium generates approximately 10 to 40 mg zeaxanthin per litre (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). Supplementation with palmitic esters, methionine, pyridoxine, ferrous salts, and reduction in temperature, have can increases the yield to 335 mg per litre. Oxygen Oxygen supply in the culture medium was found to be another important factor in the production of these microbial pigments (Gierhart, 1994). An increase in oxygen supply is generally correlated with an increase in the culture’s productivity. Oxygen is not only required for the growth of Sphingobacterium sp. alone, but also for desaturation, cyclization and oxygenation of carotenoids (Sajilata, Singhal & Kamat, 2008). Zeaxanthin production can be improved by having a high oxygen transfer rate fermentor. The oxygen supply in the fermentor is effectively affected by two factors: agitation speed and aeration rate. The oxygen supply required by the growing culture can be adjusted by having a proper combination of these two factors.  References Abro, A. H., Rahimi Shahmirzadi, M. R., Jasim, L. M., Badreddine, S., & Al Deesi, Z. (2016). Sphingobacterium multivorum Bacteremia and Acute Meningitis in an Immunocompetent Adult Patient: A Case Report. Iranian Red Crescent medical journal, 18(9), e38750. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.38750 Alcantara, S. & Sanchez, S. (1999). Influence of carbon and nitrogen sources on Flavobacterium growth and zeaxanthin biosynthesis. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 23, 697-700. Garnett, K. M., Gierhart, D. L. & Guerra-Santos, L. H. (1998). Method of making pure 3R-3_R stereoisomer of zeaxanthin for human ingestion. U.S. patent 5,854,015. date of issue Dec 29 1998. Gierhart, D. L. & Applied Food Biotechnology Inc. (1994). Production of zeaxanthin and zeaxanthin-containing compositions. U.S. patent 5,308,759. date of issue May 3

Scroll to top
Chat Icon
Weisr Close Icon
Hi! Welcome to Food Microbiology Academy. How can I help you?
Our Latest Articles
Food safety tips
Blog Search
Start Quiz
Food for Thought

Search Blog

return
Food Microbiology Academy